Last week The Bill & Malinda Gates Foundation released initial findings from its Measures of Effective Teaching investigation — a much needed $45 million effort to determine which teachers are good or not, and why.
As other research has found, the Gates investigators concluded that the value- added calculations of a teacher's performance can fluctuate significantly but not enough to preclude the data from being used as part of a more comprehensive system of evaluation. (A position I've argued here since this blog's inception.) As Education Week summed it up: "So far, the study...appears to support the notion, advocated by teachers’ unions and others, that evaluations should be based on multiple measures."
Perhaps, most importantly, the initial findings revealed much stronger correlations between classroom conditions, teaching practices and student achievement. Most notable were similarities in the predictive effect of teachers' value-added histories and students’ perceptions of a teacher’s ability to challenge students with rigorous work.
As the MET findings suggest, success in accurately identifying effective teachers will require erudite interpretation from those who know teaching and learning and the context in which practitioners teach. The researchers concluded that “reinventing the way we evaluate and develop teachers will eventually require new infrastructure” — using digital video as well as peer observations.
In determining who is an effective teacher, it's time for classroom practitioners (and their unions) to take the lead in establishing and enforcing standards among their ranks and beginning to function more like professional guilds.
Dina Strasser, a TLN member from our virtual community, engaged in a lengthy conversation earlier this fall with a doctor-turned-teacher over what it might take for teaching to fully evolve as a profession. It makes for interesting reading.
Perhaps Vinnie Basile of Westminster 50 (Colorado) — a participant in the CTQ/TLN New Millennium Initiative — put it most clearly and simply:
Transforming the union into the professional guild is the central, unifying solution to many of the otherwise divided issues in education reform. It empowers teachers to take control of their own career paths, enforcing a set of standards that in many cases would far exceed the expectations of policymakers and the general public.
The MET research edges teaching toward professionalism by helping establish empirical links between what teachers do and how students learn — and why. But only teacher leaders can truly make sense of all of this data. And they are in the best position to ensure that the data are used to drive changes in everyday classroom realities and the improvements in the lives of students and their families and communities.

Yes - this inching towards effective evaluation of teachers is a positive note, in what often becomes an unhelpful reform debate. However, my question is - what do we do when we get there?
Let's say we do learn how to evaluate teachers effectively and we find, as I suspect we will, that the career of teaching has attracted many members of the corps who are not intellectually up to the task. Are we ready to invest in a truly effective teaching force? Are we willing to give up on a rather cheap contingent of people whose main view of teaching is "lovin the kids" and work to attract a new group who are not only into "lovin the kids" but the deeper and time consuming work of creating an energetic learning environment centered around a deep understanding of content and pedagogy. I think we are not really ready for the change (in dollars) necessary to attract the type of people that the research finds are truly effective. So I am again left with the wondering - if we are not going to fix it, why analyze it?
Sorry for sounding like such a downer but my glass is half full today!
Posted by: Lizwisniewski | December 18, 2010 at 08:30 AM
Liz. Sorry for the tardy response! I hold the same sentiments, but I am buoyed by our growing virtual community of accomplished teachers whose collective voices we seek to elevate -- and our efforts to have their ideas heard, understood, and embraced.
My latest post on teacherpreneurism - a concept illuminated in a new book. Teaching 2030, that I have penned with 12 teaching colleagues — pushes on some the important issues you have raised. we have an uphill climb. There are significant forces that have sought to keep teachers "cheap and compliant" for a long time. But they can be overcome....but not w/o teacher leaders like you!
Posted by: teachingquality | December 31, 2010 at 06:00 PM